« March 2005 | Main | May 2005 »

Family Photo Restoration...

G_n_g_3My Grandpa and Grandma Borsch were at Lake Louise in Banff, Canada back in the 1970's. I absolutely loved this picture of the two of them near this obelisk, but didn't have them together in a shot. So I spent a little time in Photoshop and moved Grandpa next to Grandma. This was a bit tricky since their respective reflections were in the orb on top of the obelisk, so I had to clone the reflection too! Though I can see a few places where the photo is manipulated, no one else can.

I've invested quite a bit of time restoring my family photos. I've been struck over and over again how there is only *one* copy of a given picture and one person has it. So far, I've restored roughly 300 photos and have probably another 1,000 to go. Able to crank out 50 photos in an 8 hour shift on a weekend, do the math: I've got a ways to go.

I've been looking for batch processing capability that wouldn't cost me an arm-and-leg to get these images scanned at least (I could then restore them at my leisure). I also think about all the people in a similiar situation to me: thousands of priceless family photos on paper, fading and crumbling with time, and a computer just sitting there as a place to manipulate and store them.

The Act of Creation. Step 1: Set Your Intention

Store_1I'm sitting in a coffee shop (in an 1880's farmhouse) this morning with the day off...and have been thinking about what is around me, the people that lived here once and the world they had created for themselves...and the one we're creating for ourselves today.

This place makes me think about my great grandfather John Borsch. He was a merchant in Minnesota who set his intention to create a business that would grow, sustain his family and be a vehicle for wealth.

The picture you see here is his store. It was located near a railroad depot and the men who worked the railroad (and passengers) shopped here regularly. He also found out from some of them about distressed merchants in other cities. John decided to create opportunity for himself, traveled to these cities, bought up the distressed merchants property, crated it up and returned to Minneapolis. Liquidating much of the inventory in the big city before taking the remainder back to this store in a smaller town 20 miles away (which now is a close-in suburb!), John was able to accumulate wealth fairly quickly.

He retired at 45 and moved to Minneapolis with my great grandmother (Clara) and became a builder. The Depression hit and he owned many houses, and his son (my grandpa) encouraged him to kick out the freeloading tenants and get paid renters, but it was John's intention to have pristine properties and allowed the tenants without jobs to stay for free in exchange for sweat investments. His houses were immaculate while others during the Depression didn't fare so well or sat without tenants for years.

Step 1: Setting Your Intention
Spending time with my good friend George Johnson and having him be my "coach" a few years ago, we have had several conversations about the universal truths that intention contains and how that impacts creativity and realizing the true essence of oneself. He consistently smiles when I profess to be "so close that I can taste it" in aligning with my essence (I suspect he knows I'll discover it eventually and utilize it) but I'm not quite there yet.

One of my favorite speakers and authors is Wayne Dyer who speaks and has written about The Power of Intention. Dyer makes the case that *everything* touched by the hand of humans has been created. I buy that. He also talks about the power of God and tapping in to universal truths and, most interestingly, how once you've set your intention, things begin to happen that seemingly and automagically line up to drive momentum behind your intention. My head is there too.

It works. I've tried it again and again but just for little stuff as I've been reluctant to leap off the cliff with the really big stuff (George would have a knowing smile about this statement too). George has created the 7 Entrepreneurial Skills to coach people that are driving toward fulfilling their intentions and aligning with the essence of who they are. He can already recite success stories of people that have set their intention and created their future by following the steps outlined in the 7 Entrepreneurial Skills. You know this stuff works. Who among us can't point to dozens...even hundreds...of people who have set their intention and created companies, products or services out of seemingly thin air?

What does this have to do with your Connecting the Dots blog Borsch?
Think about what I blog about: the brain and brain chemistry; physics; technology; nanotech; audio/video/text blogging and how it's already created grassroots journalism; the collective consciousness of the internet and its morphing into something like a "super think tank"; atoms vs. bits and so on. If you consider the enabling "dots" that can be connected in all of these different fields -- and how inventions, change and development is occurring due to some person or group's intention and creation -- I find it fun to try to understand how they intersect and think about what could be.

Is there a dark side of intention and creation?

Without *positive* directed intention and creation, we might end up with something we don't want. When Bill Joy wrote his warning article in Wired magazine in April of 2000 about our creation of technology driving us toward a future where humans are obsolete, it created a firestorm of writings, commentary and debate about what our future holds. I was delighted with it since it asked a fundamental question still unanswered: What do we intend our future to become? Rather than rush headlong in to developing everything that is possible and unleashing technologies without some form of governance and risk assessment, Joy submits that it is a fool's errand to not set intention and co-create our future with our eyes wide open.

One thing I do no for sure: each of us is in the act of creating our own respective futures right now and together we're creating our collective future. Moment by moment...step by step...intention by intention...creation by creation.

But what future do you -- and we together -- intend to create?

China's Comeuppance

BweekAfter years of reading articles in magazines like Business Week and others about China's counterfeiting, it was with amusement that I read an article today that starts out like this:

The five-volume "Executive Ability" book series is a classic in Chinese business and management circles. Collectively, it has sold more than 2 million copies in the last two years. Top universities and public libraries in China keep multiple copies on hand.  It's also a big fake.

You can read today's article in the LA Times yourself here.

So this country that is knocking off everything they can (Windows OS, furniture, cars, pharmaceuticals and more) is now relying on fake business advice.

Serves 'em right.

Tiger eats Longhorn?

T_eat_l_1On Friday, Apple is shipping the new version of Mac OS X "Tiger".  Bill Gates this week "unveiled" (like it was a secret) their next version of Windows dubbed "Longhorn".

Clearly concerned about the inherent security of a Unix-based operating system (OS), great graphics, a better client experience and Spotlight shipping in an OS roughly a year and a half before search even close to Spotlight debuts in Longhorn, Microsoft may not be nervous but undoubtedly ensuring they're viewed as the technology leader...not Apple.

Is it just me...or is the timing of this amusing to you too?

Vlogging: Grassroots media continues to explode

VlogI've had lots 'o debates with people at work (and received a lot of teasing) about my trying to get people to understand the rapid acceleration in blogging and podcasting. You know what? Vlogging (or video blogging) is already accelerating almost as fast (and I frankly don't care if people I interact with don't get everything that is happening with grassroots media or don't believe it).

Still, don't take my word for the fact that this is happening...click on the links below and see for yourself what people are already doing and the volume of vlogs already online. Though most of the content below is clearly garage or basement quality, it will give you a sense of what people are doing with vlogging and the potential that exists. It reminds me of the cheesey quality of early works in the mid-Eighties created as a result of a phenomena called Desktop Publishing (DTP) that skeptics also didn't believe would take off...and it has revolutionized the publishing world (early DTP works contained an explosion of fonts, bad design and worse layout...but people learned).

There is a convergence of factors which have collided enabling this to explode: enabling tools that are PC-based, web-based services to host and deliver the blogs, podcasts and vlogs (that are free or really cheap), and broadband adoption.

As I wrote about previously regarding the free media hosting site Ourmedia.org, about the tipping point with blogs and podcasts; and startups like Brightcove; much of the systemic enabling services are quickly getting in to place. With all the enabling tools out there like iMovie, Audioblog, inexpensive camcorders and digital cameras, and everything at our fingertips, we ain't seen nothin' yet.

Amazon's A9 Search: Personalization and History

A9_1Amazon has entered search. Look out Google and Microsoft.

When Amazon first began gaining a lot of traction in the marketplace back in 2000, I was at Vignette. A part of our value proposition was web-based "implicit" and "explicit" personalization of content. Implicit was tough to do (an observation process ran and -- based on clickstream data -- would automatically deliver the right content to the right person) and explicit was easy (someone would login and then the site would deliver content germane to that person).

Instead of an observation process or daemon running to only just deliver personalized content, Amazon leveraged Net Perceptions' Recommendation Engine for collaborative filtering and have gone way beyond it. When you peruse a product on Amazon, the site immediately tells you accessories (and what percent of people buy them), reviews and much more. Amazon's ability to set context, make connections between product-to-accessories-to-similiar products-to-opinions is nothing short of phenomenal...and don't even get me started on their "Associates" program and how they've extended their brand and catalog all over the 'net or what they've done with web services.

So it comes as no surprise that Amazon has leveraged their expertise and jumped in to search with a new offering dubbed "A9".

This search engine is *really* cool. Rather than have me describe it here, go there, read about it first and then spend some time playing with it. Oh yeah...I should mention that here's yet *another* example of using an Ajax approach to building fast, browser-based capability so the user interface feels like a desktop application.

Podscope: Search *inside* of podcasts

PodscopeBack in February I did a post about "Searching *inside* your photos, podcasts, videos and more..." which described some of the enterprise tools that are available which could solve a problem about to explode with the groundswell of media being created: big blobs like media files require metadata tags to be added to them describing what's inside the file (which most humans just won't do). Just think about your own email filing in to folders or how you manage all the computer files on your desktop. Bet you don't do either.

Though I've met a few anally retentive and/or highly organized individuals who *do* perform metatagging or have built a taxonomy of folders on their computer for storing stuff...it's the rare individual who does it. Just one reason why Mac OS X Tiger will contain Spotlight and Longhorn will contain search so people can easily have their own explosion of unstructured content on their computers easily searched and managed.  I was and am convinced there are enterprise-class tools that make the process of finding what's inside media files manageable and -- when hosted and offered as software-as-a-service --  could apply enough horsepower to solve the problem for mere mortals.

Enter a new hosted service currently in Beta called "Podscope" powered by "TVEyes". They're offering exactly what I'd described in that earlier post: using an industrial strength, enterprise-class toolset and applying it to a micro problem like looking for what's inside a podcast.

Very cool and just the start of this trend in my view....

Where is the "iPhone"?

Iphone5_1There has been a lot of buzz about the agreement last summer between Motorola and Apple for a mobile phone that would also deliver iPod-like functionality and be easily connected to a PC and iTunes for music download over a broadband connection. Design firms like xnodesign have even put together fun prototypes of an "iPhone" like the one at left.

Got some bad news for ya. We're not going to see it from Apple or Motorola. Looks like the mobile phone companies are telling Ed Zander and Steve Jobs to go pound sand since they're perceived to be cutting-in-on-the-action of the wireless carriers business.

Last summer Forbes discussed the possibility that the wireless carriers wanted to sell music themselves and the current Business Week has a great article about what they're up to and asks, "iPod killer?" when looking at this standoff. In an article in Fortune magazine from last year it was discussed that the new, hot Motorola Razor phone was not pleasing to the mobile carriers since all it did was voice and the carriers wanted to sell data services.

Data services are big business. According to Strategy Analytics, Inc., "(ringtones)...will become a nearly $9.4 billion business in 2008." The carriers are offering ringtones for $1-$3 for all the boneheads willing to buy tiny little midi files and download them to their phone. The kicker? A tiny 30k ringtone downloaded is no problem over a wireless mobile connection. A 3MB song? Several 3MB songs? Ahhh....I think we got a problem here kids. To show you how excited some are about *just* this ringtone business, Rio Caraeff, VP of Universal Mobile Music has said, "...teenagers sometimes swap out ringtones as many as three to four times a week" and "Ringtones are all about personalization. They are self-expression."

Don't these people think that teenagers will figure out that an iTunes song is $ .99 and the stupid ringtone they're buying is $2 or more!?!

I believe strongly that wireless companies have also pressured phone makers to remove Bluetooth or USB connection capability to the file structure of phones or for using the phone as a laptop data connection. Besides downloading phone photos, updating contact lists and address books with a PC to phone connection, one of the other useful things to do with such a connection is uploading your own midi files for ringtones (which is brain-dead-simple and I used to do all the time with my older Nokia 3650. There are even utilities to generate small midi files easily). There is no way wireless carriers are going to allow us to leverage this capability ourselves so they've slammed that door shut by simply not allowing phones with this capability on their networks or to be subsidized by them (killing its chances of adoption). They're not going to allow Motorola or Apple to control what they perceive to be a new cash cow with ringtones and digital music, so the door is slammed shut on both companies.

Here's yet another case of vendors (the wireless carriers) doing what is good for THEM vs. what is good for US.

Adobe + Macromedia = Bonanza?

BonanzaI remember that we were the first people on our block with a color television in 1968. Watching Bonanza and Walt Disney's "The Wonderful World of Color" on Sunday night's was amazing with our own color TV! Besides...we ended up watching a lot more TV when we could see it in color.

So what does that have to do with yesterday's announcement of Adobe buying Macromedia?

There is a lot of conjecture about the strategic reasons Adobe bought them (competing with Microsoft is but one). I submit that *the* primary reason is the ubiquity of the Flash container and all that it means for video and the continuation of the drive toward on demand media consumption and a bonanza of profit to be gained from it. Let me outline a few thoughts:

  • As you can see from the post below, the video that is playing is done through a Flash player. My provider (Audioblog) lets me upload an .AVI video, they instantly encode it in to Flash, and allow me to publish it to my blog. The video aspect of the Flash container is but one key reason this deal got done. No more "choose Quicktime, Windows Media, Real Player" when you want to ensure that your users can play your content
  • Today Macromedia Inc. and Speedera Networks launched a secure delivery system for Internet video aimed at boosting pay-per-view video and other online subscription services. The kicker? Akamai recently acquired Speedera which will provide the technologies to deliver rich media in a way that allows content providers to get paid (leveraging Akamai's robust, global edge network)
  • OK...the acquisition was not all about video. Rich Internet Applications (RIA) are gaining momentum and Macromedia is right there with Flex -- though many of my alpha programmer pals would differ with RIA's readiness for prime-time user interfaces (and are more interested in approaches such as Ajax). Still...there are competing offerings from Laszlo Systems and their open source alternative, Open Laszlo (which has been embraced by IBM), so it's not just Microsoft that Adobe is positioning themselves against and Flash is the main reason for this deal in my view.

So how this acquisition is leveraged is going to be very, very interesting to watch.

UPDATE: Read "Adobe + Macromedia = PDF"
 

Will the Balance of Power tip to China?

Cn_1On the way to work the other morning I listened to this fabulous IT Conversations podcast done by Dr. Moira Gunn of Tech Nation (the National Public Radio show). It was an interview by Dr. Gunn with professor Oded Shenkar, Ford Motor Company Chair, Global Business Management, Ohio State University, and the author of, "The Chinese Century -- The Rising Chinese Economy and its Impact on the Global Economy, The Balance of Power and Your Job."

They discussed the rise of China and some interesting connections he's made about the seeming inevitability that the United States and other Western states reigns as superpowers (or major economic powers) will soon be over.

How feasible is this premise?

Take a look at the video below. It's amusing to view but then think about the euphoria that existed within the automobile industry in 1960 ("What’s good for the country is good for General Motors, and vice versa." Charles Wilson (Head of GM, 1941-1953)). Then connect the dots between how it was and about what's already happened in just one (albeit huge and visible) industry through the efforts of a tiny country (Japan) with limited people and resources: the United States' lead in automobile production is over. Toyota has already surpassed the Ford Motor Company as the world's #2 car maker.

China is not far behind. People, capital, and joint ventures with 50-50 ownership is allowing China to accelerate their position in the world economically. What other industries will they soon dominate?

The 1960 "The Wonderful World of Ford"
new car introduction film...

A "Dad and Son Adventure" to the Black Hills of South Dakota

A short 2 1/2 minute movie from our recent adventure to the Black Hills of South Dakota (see this post and this one).

Mac OS X Tiger

Mac_os_x_box_2Though I've been aware of the features in the next iteration of Apple's Mac OS X operating system dubbed "Tiger" for some time, I am still anticipating it's arrival on April 29th.

As a daily user of Windows XP (both at home and work) and SuSe Linux (on my home PC), I'm perhaps in a unique position to compare-n-contrast the use of each of these operating systems (disclaimer: we own several Mac's and only one PC at home).

With both Windows XP and the first version of Mac OS X released in 2001, I decided the time had come to either upgrade *all* my apps to this new operating system (and upgrade all apps *and* machines in my wife's office) or toss them all out and roll to Windows XP (Linux wasn't an option due to lack of apps for graphics and publishing).

So I did a test. Bought a Sony laptop running WinXP and obtained Mac OS X and upgraded one machine. I "lived" with them both for November/December of 2001 and January of 2002. The outcome? Experientially the difference was like driving a 1995 Olds Cutlass Ciera vs. a Lexus ES300: both would get you to the destination, but one was a *much* more pleasant experience (and contrary to the car analogy, roughly the same price and I'd be happy to argue this point). Since then -- between home use and her office -- we've purchased a dozen machines, many applications and peripherals.

I've experienced this new Tiger version of Mac OS X since the company I work for is an Apple Developer (we support Safari). It is a major upleveling of the already delightful operating environment and I'm eagerly awaiting it. I know a lot of pundits talk about how Spotlight (the WinFS search competitor in Tiger) is really cool and going to ship MUCH sooner than Microsoft's Longhorn, but that's only part of the story.

In my view the REAL story is the seamless, intuitive to use, pleasing to view, application integrated and machine optimized operating system that Microsoft simply will be unable to compete with as the iterations of OS X accelerate. The punchline to the story is the ease (relatively speaking) of supporting Linux and Unix apps in Mac OS X and how -- since Microsoft's enterprise direction is with .Net and the rest of the universe is Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) and supporting open standards -- Apple is in a unique position to end up as a strong personal computing alternative to Microsoft.

Even if enterprise success doesn't occur, it's inherently more interesting to make something that millions upon millions of people lust after (think iPod and Mac Mini) than a few hundred CIO's want to have you build.

The web...at your service

WebservicesThe traditional view of web services has been focused on protocols and standards for exchanging data between applications. The primary method to exchange has been over the HTTP transport (most companies block ports in their firewalls but port 80, the HTTP/web browser used port, is always open).

But like most things in information technology, descriptions and value propositions are ever morphing and changing. Though one could argue that web services have *always* been about protocols and data exchange, they're really about discrete applications unto themselves and only now are we starting to see the real power of interapplication operatibility via web services.

To make available powerful, deep and broad value offerings to market and encourage web service applications to be built on top of them, take a look at what these three powerhouses are up to along with a new model for managing web services:

  • Amazon has exposed their application programming interface (API) making use and reuse of their powerhouse of products a fairly trivial matter. In fact, the links to all the products on my blog here are done through Associates.Amazon.com accessible through their API and every time someone clicks on a product and buys it, I get a little commission (and I've made $ .87 since December!).
  • Salesforce.com has their platform exposed web services API called "SForce". Many companies have extended salesforce.com and also built applications on top of their platform.
  • One of the *most* intriguing business models is a company called Grand Central Communications (started by Halsey Minor of CNet fame) that has positioned themselves as the hub for web services.

If you want to learn a lot more, sign up for the free WebServices.org site, Joe's set o' links, or peek at this directory. Lot's of good stuff.

Perspective goes to both the victor and the vanquished

Crazy"History is written by the victors," said Winston Churchill. Sad but true. Growing up playing cowboys and indians, watching TV and movie westerns, and being taught about the tragedy of Custer's Last Stand, gave me a perspective that has taken me decades to balance and learn about the perspective of the other side...the vanquished native American.

Today's experience at the Crazy Horse monument was interesting on many fronts: it's a grander, larger and more magnificent monument than Mt. Rushmore but is many, many decades away from completion. The native people I spoke with today clearly have the perspective that their leaders were as equally great as the men who founded and enhanced our nation.

In the bookstore at the monument were several books about yesterday's post regarding the massacre at Wounded Knee. All the titles were ones like, "The Massacre at Wounded Knee. Stories from native survivors" or "Wounded Knee: History from our Perspective." I picked them up and skimmed them all. It was much different than what I'd been taught as a kid and has provided me with a profound realization that "the battle" as it's been characterized truly was uncalled for and was genocide.

One other thing happened today that was pretty profound and added to my pondering about things that had occurred not all that long ago. It was my son and I driving through Custer State Park and detouring down "the Wildlife Loop". We saw wild turkey's, antelope, mountain goats and bison.

Buffalo_1The bison! We were driving down the loop (which was right out of Dances with Wolves) when we came over a rise and there -- on each side of the road and *on* the road -- were 150 or so bison. Huge ones like the guy at the left as well as scraggly looking oldsters, females and what looked like yearlings. I shut off the engine, put the car in neutral, and we sloooowly glided to a stop right in the middle of the herd.

We sat there with the windows rolled down, took pictures, listened and looked. What magnificent creatures. Again, this experience was tinged by the sadness of the slaughter of tens of millions of these animals that once roamed the plains and these Black Hills freely. Now only a few hundred thousand remain.

Two cars and a couple on a loud Harley came over the rise back in the distance and stopped. My son asked a few minutes later, "Dad...are the bison passing gas?" Chuckling I said, "Nope. They're snorting and I think they're warning each other." Sure enough, the snorting grew louder and you could see the herd start to become visibly agitated as they milled about. The cars and motorcycle grew closer (I started my engine and slowly moved forward) and the herd began to shift and move off the road until we'd all passed by.

Curiously, the victors over the bison barely mention the 60 million number (of bison that once roamed North America) and the reasons behind this mass killing. Though I'm a fan of the old West and a bit of a history buff, I learned this approximation of the number of bison when I was about 35 years old -- nothing in school was said. Of course, bison can't write books or carve mountain monuments so their perspective isn't available.

Thinking about how it was...at Mt. Rushmore

MtrushmoreWhen my son's spring break "Dad & Son Adventure" to Orlando's Universal Studios didn't work out (flights home were booked), I asked him where he wanted to go. "How about Hawaii Dad?" "Ahh...we've got three days pal."  To my surprise he asked, "OK. How about Mt. Rushmore? I've never seen it."

Neither had I. So here we are in surprisingly warm Rapid City, SD (76 degrees today).

We're staying in an old historic hotel downtown (with free wireless internet and a lot of character) and we just got done talking about our next two days here. We're going to the Mammoth Site, Custer State Park, Jewel Cave and a bunch of other attractions (oh yeah, and Mt. Rushmore).

We also talked about how it was before Mt. Rushmore, Rapid City and the interstate. 60 million bison roamed North America before they were killed for fun from the iron horse (train) as well as to remove the primary food source from the natives. The Sioux and other natives were living peacefully a couple of days horseback ride away from where we are right now (in Wounded Knee, SD). 

Not all was well in this part of the West. Seems the Sioux were performing a "ghost dance" to bring snow (and cover the white man) as well as protecting them from the calvary soldier's bullets. Settlers were quite afraid and called in the calvary. The result was a single shot during a sitdown that gave the soldiers justification for a horrific massacre at Wounded Knee in 1890 and the last "official battle in the Indian wars".

Much has changed. Much stays the same.

Nanotech delivering drugs in to cancer cells?

Cells_1_1Two people I know well have recently been diagnosed with cancer. As has happened before in my observation of those with this disease, it's the chemotherapy or radiation treatments that are devastating...not the cancer itself or the drugs to kill those aberrant cells. Losing one's hair, a compromised immune system and crushing fatigue are but a few of the big impacts to either of these approaches.

Several years ago I read a book about the early days of pharmacology. Seems that discovery's were made that found certain toxic chemicals -- in low doses -- penetrated cells. Forward thinking scientists surmised that drugs could be carried in to cancer cells and thus kill them. Unfortunately, even these low dose toxic chemicals are quite destructive to a human being.

Remembering an article I'd read some time ago about nanotechnology research that was being targeted at using this tiny technology to "stick" to targeted cancer cells (delivering the cancer killing drugs directly to where they're needed), I did a Google search and discovered several very interesting articles. A new article published just last month caught my eye.

But the biggest "whoa" came when I clicked a link and stumbled in to a fascinating web site delivered by the National Cancer Institute "NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer" organization. Their mission?

To help meet the goal of eliminating suffering and death from cancer, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health, is engaged in efforts to harness the power of nanotechnology to radically change the way we diagnose, treat and prevent cancer.

The NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer is a comprehensive, systematized initiative encompassing the public and private sectors, designed to accelerate the application of the best capabilities of nanotechnology to cancer.

Billions of Earths?

Hubble_galaxiesAccording to an article on BBC.com, possibly "...half of all the known planetary systems today could be harboring habitable worlds." The Open University team presented its ideas today at the UK National Astronomy Meeting at the University of Birmingham in the U.K.

A Discover magazine article from five years ago starts out like this: "A little more than 400 years ago, Italian philosopher and astronomer Giordano Bruno theorized that the universe was filled with an infinite number of stars orbited by an infinite number of worlds. For that astounding insight and others he was branded a heretic by the Catholic Church and burned at the stake." It goes on to discuss the current state of knowledge around other worlds and the possibility of them.

How can you not look up in the night sky and think about the billions of galaxies that are up there and the planets that are undoubtedly circling those other stars? I've had several conversations over the last several months with people whose views are more aligned with the heretic branders than with philosopher's and scientist's.

To me a simple glance up in the night sky and even a moment taken to ponder the universe and its mysteries would cause me to not be so narrow. Of course, Copernicus had quite a time convincing the church that the Earth rotated around the Sun and Galileo equally struggled to show that his observations with his new fangled telescope confirmed these and many other theories. Copernicus was informed by Rome that his was, "foolish and absurd philosophically and formally heretical inasmuch as it expressly contradicts the doctrines of the holy scripture" and there is evidence that Galileo was warned on his visit to Rome in 1615 not to espouse this Copernican doctrine.   

YOU are radio...YOU are TV

Get ready to either produce content or have access to alot of it.

1) Podcasting is catching on...if you've ever thought about getting in to radio, here's your chance:

According to Pew Internet & American Life project study released today, "More than 22 million American adults own iPods or MP3 players and 29% of them have downloaded podcasts from the Web so that they could listen to audio files at a time of their choosing. That amounts to more than 6 million adults who have tried this new feature that allows internet “broadcasts” to be downloaded onto their portable listening device."

Go here and you can download the PDF of the report.

UPDATE: Engadget "outs" the seemingly inflated numbers.

2) Google is setting up a service to allow personal video's to be added to their video search announced in January.

What does this mean? I did a whole post on this on February 1st and there is NO question in my mind that this is inherently interesting for anyone who has ever tried to search for a video. As videoblogging catches on (maybe there will "vpod-casting" if Apple does a video player?) there has to be a way to index and search video content.

With audio and video innovations like iPodder, Podcast.net, Podcast Directory, Podshow, Brightcove, Ourmedia.org, Digital Bicycle, ANT, Vimeo and Vlog Central as well as those that have been around awhile like the Internet Archive, YOU will be the radio and YOU will be the TV. The tools are here and now the distribution and models are too. What an exciting time!   

Conjuring Mr. X

My son and I have been goofin' around with podcasting. He did one so I did one too.

This first effort was done in about an hour. A made-up 3 1/2 minute story (he said, "Make it REALLY scary Dad!" but it's not), some music, a few sound effects and here we go...


MP3 File

Goodbye Rebates!

Stopbbc_1Rebates are one of those practices that I've hated for years as have others. Knowing right from the get-go that it was a scheme to either delay payment (use the float on our cash), keep the cash from the boneheads that didn't send in the rebate forms and -- like a good insurance company does -- simply deny the claim on a technicality which further lowers the percentage of people willing to fight you for a few bucks. (Interesting study in HTML or PDF).

So I was delighted to crack open the Minneapolis Star/Tribune this morning to this article (free reg required) about what my hometown consumer electronics behemoth is doing. It says in part, "In response to customer complaints, Best Buy Co. Inc., the world's largest electronics retailer, promised Friday to eliminate mail-in rebates within two years. Best Buy's rivals, including Circuit City Stores and CompUSA, are expected to follow suit." Crack open the champagne!

Here's what you might be missing about this announcement though....some insight as to why Best Buy would be willing to give up what feels to the consumer as ill-gotten gains from rebates.

The context of this article is a separate one in the same issue of the paper (though they didn't refer to one another) which discusses the success of  Best Buy's "customer centricity" model. The article mentions, "As part of the customer centricity strategy, Best Buy identified five customer segments that are among some of the company's most profitable customers. Best Buy tailors a store's products and service to target one or more of these customer segments, depending on which ones shop there." Think of Web commerce-like personalization of the customer experience focused on the bricks-n-mortar crowd (though their approach is still highly generalized by broad customer segments) and the deployment of new store strategies (Best Buy is planning to convert all 830 of its U.S. stores within three years to this new model).

Best Buy has undoubtedly learned that -- even though rebates add to the bottom line -- focusing on the customer experience and targeting directly to profitable ones yields significantly greater profits than does angering them en masse. Though you might say, "Duh!" as though this is brain-dead obvious and simple, in-store personalization to achieve profits is *really* hard since you can't re-orient and re-display atoms in a physical location like you can do it instantly (and for each person I might add) with bits on the Web.

My visit to Mars today...

Borsch_on_mars_1Between coffee this morning and lunch, I headed over to a local market and was abducted by aliens. Thankfully they were from Mars where anal probes are NOT in vogue.

I knew no one would believe my whirlwind trip, so I begged Commander Dweebezaarb (CD) to take a quick pic in front of the Mars rover (by the way, he's pretty pissed that we're sending stuff up there with no intention of retrieving it).

One hilarious thing happened today that I've just got to jot down before I forget how funny it was: CD told me a story. Seems there was a Martian teacher and his student in the underground bar beneath the Gusev Crater. They were sitting on these hard bar stools talking about famous Earth philosophers when the teacher said to the student, "Have you read Marx?" and he said, "Yeah...I think it's from these stools."

Oh man...those Martians are a hoot.

----------------------------------------------------

UPDATE: OK...this was funny to my 10 year old and only got a courtesy laugh from my wife.

My Photo

Contact Steve

My Business Card

SEARCH

Take a Peek

My Other Blog

*Connect Your Own Dots* Reading List

COPYRIGHT

-