TSA and Secure Flight

Tsa_1In a post today from noted security expert Bruce Schneier, he examines the Transportation Security Administration's "Secure Flight". It's a pretty sobering read.

As I've expressed previously on this blog, I've been specifically steering clear of discussions of politics (e.g., geopolitics), macroeconomics, and other areas where I actually do connect some dots but those dots are in areas in which it seems prudent to be distant. It's pretty clear to me that a climate of fear is slowly rising in the U.S. and, one could argue, concern over our terrorism-related tactics domestically, treatment of those suspected of having intelligence as well as our foundation-lacking motives to take over and build a strategic position in Iraq has already manifested itself in to distrust globally.

I'm concerned that a continued raising of a climate of fear and accelerating profiling of the American citizenry will raise barriers to internet innovation (in my view an engine for the economy) right here at home as well as abroad. We've already seen moves by the government to ensure that the internet can be monitored globally with initiatives like Echelon and the highly controversial domestic Carnivore system. I believe that this increase in monitoring the internet has profound and troubling security, privacy and trust implications. These negatives could materially and negatively impact the U.S. use of internet-centric innovation by businesses and organizations which absolutely must compete on a world stage.

Every time I fly I'm struck by the illusion we all have that we're somehow safer and less prone to terrorist attack. Isn't it curious when you realize that all the Dept of Homeland Security color-coded alerts that occurred in the runup to the last election occurred at major holidays -- when the maximum number of travelers would be in our airports afraid of terrorism? Isn't it also interesting that -- since the election -- there haven't been any warnings of note? Does that mean our investment in the TSA has stopped air terrorism?

In a talk on IT Conversations with Mr. Schneier some time ago, he pointed out the obvious: that our overwhelming investment in airport/airline security is like padlocking the barn door after the horse has bolted and is long gone...and that terrorists would simply look for other targets minimally secured (and there have been numerous stories written and produced about the lack of security at other main targets). One example of this was the knee-jerk reaction by the transit authorities nationally after the London bombings. I worry about the Mall of America in my own backyard as well as other sensitive targets I'd rather not point out in public.

If what Mr. Schneier describes (TSA building a draconian extensible and scalable data warehouse for collecting information for "profiling" passengers) is true which I believe is the case, the implications of this far exceed the boundaries of protecting air travel, will raise the climate of fear amongst the US citizenry and add to the dim view many countries in the world now hold toward us.

The Operating System is Dead

NeoofficeI've posted in the past about my daily use of WindowsXP, Linux and my preferred OS, Mac OS X. When I think about what I'm interested in doing with any of my computers (photo work; video & audio editing; print/web/blog publishing; using my iPod; surfing the Web) I realize that these tasks simply perform better under Mac OS X. It's also a more elegant OS with a "fit and finish" that is far superior to Windows or every Linux distro I've ever experienced.

I'll admit that there is more software for Windows but I will submit that I strongly believe an OS choice no longer matters -- and that the OS is dead (or at the very least a moot point). With the release of alternative applications (like NeoOffice in the screenshot at left) it makes using a non-Windows OS a lot easier for those that need to interoperate with users of alternative OS'es (like Windows). The release of NeoOffice for Mac OS X provides a free, robust alternative to Microsoft Office -- arguably the killer app required for cross-over OS use -- and makes it easier to use the platform *you* want vs. the ones your friends tell you that you should buy.

What other reason is there to state the OS no longer matters and is dead? Just about anything interesting and meaningful is available on the Web and, thank God, people have become smart enough (most of them anyway) to actually embrace open standards vs. tying their offerings to a specific OS-centric model.

Don't agree about the "interesting and meaningful" quip above? Well then...how often do you buy a piece of software that's standalone for your computer? If you *do* use a piece of software, how many do you use in isolation on your computer vs. those that gain A LOT of additional value through an internet connection (consider Quicken and the value it gets from a 'net connection)? Would you buy a multimedia CD-ROM of the Encyclopedia Britanica or use one available via the Web that can be instantly updated when information changes? How about news? Blogging? Collaborating with family and friends on something like Yahoo Groups?

I rarely buy software anymore but spend money monthly on Web-based services. How about you?

My Photo

Contact Steve

My Business Card

SEARCH

Take a Peek

My Other Blog

*Connect Your Own Dots* Reading List

COPYRIGHT

-